earnforviews vs Clipping
Clipping is one of the biggest names in paid clipping. Here is where we differ, stated fairly, so you can pick with open eyes.
Where Clipping is strong
Clipping built an enormous clipper network around streamer, podcast and music content, with campaigns from household names. If your whole workflow is cutting clips from source footage at high volume, their scale is a genuine advantage, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.
Where we differ by design
| Clipping | earnforviews | |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign breadth | Clipping-centric | Clipping, UGC, music pushes and editor briefs on one board |
| Rates shown as | Per 100K views | Per 1K views, with an earnings estimate on every card |
| Minimum to qualify | View minimums on many campaigns | No follower or view minimum to claim a deal |
| Funding model | Brand campaigns | Every deal funded up front before it goes live |
| Withdrawals | Cycle based | On request once your verified balance crosses the minimum, PayPal or UPI |
| Brand side | Managed campaigns | Self-serve wizard with goal-based forecasts on aimviews.com |
The honest recommendation
High-volume clippers should probably be on both boards; deals are not exclusive and more funded budgets means more income. Creators who also film UGC or make edits will find more variety here. Brands who want hands-on management may prefer their model; brands who want to launch in ten minutes with a printed budget should try ours.
Our board is public. Read the rates before creating any account.
See the earnforviews board